top of page
  • decodeMR Team

Evolution of Molecular Diagnostics Market - An Expert's Perspective (#1)

(Focus- India)


This interview was originally published in www.oncofocus.com on 01st January 2020


We are kick-starting this year's 'Interview with an Expert' series with an insightful discussion with Dr. Ravi Gaur on the evolution and the dynamics of the cancer molecular diagnostics testing space in India.


Dr. Ravi Gaur is the Chief Operating Officer of Oncquest Labs and has more than 20 years of experience in the field of diagnostics. His stated goal is to make advanced diagnostics available at an affordable price and at the doorstep of the customer.


Click on 'Read More' to learn about his views on how the cancer molecular diagnostic testing space has evolved over the years and the key emerging trends and challenges in this segment.





Dr. Ravi Gaur

AM, MBBS, MD, MS

​Chief Operating Officer (COO), Oncquest Labs Ltd., New Delhi, India







Dr. Ravi Gaur is part of Verifothesis, our in-house research panel. ​Join Verifothesis to contribute to the evolution of the healthcare paradigm.


What sort of qualitative changes you have observed in the field of cancer molecular diagnostics in the last 5 years?


Dr. Ravi: Many important changes have taken place in the last few years. Rapidly evolving advanced technology for better diagnosis, lowering of price, better turnaround time, more relevant information, and much more. In the last five years, our approach to a cancer diagnosis has changed rapidly. From tissue biopsy to molecular, and getting more deeper into molecular testing to get maximum possible information about mutations is the trend. The fast-growing genomic technology has rapidly expanded to detect specific driver mutations. The understanding and acceptance of sequencing and genomics have vastly improved.


While IHC, FISH, PCR testing have been standard-of-care, but now automated PCR, multiplex PCR, digital droplet PCR, Sangers sequencing has evolved rapidly. Today, new tech like DNA Microarray and High-throughput Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) with new updated software, defined, refined finer processes are increasingly replacing older technologies.


In addition, the finding that circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating DNA in blood can also have diagnostic value in metastatic cancers allows clinicians to use them as the latent endpoints. Liquid biopsy is gaining ground given its convenience. Diagnostic tests based on such information enable “real-time” biopsies of cancer progression and response to therapy. These new molecular and cellular technologies bring more precise and objective decision-making.


The cost of assays has come down while the range of assays has grown up substantially. For example, BRCA screening for breast cancer was priced at around Rs 60,000 just a couple of years back but now costs around Rs 25,000. Not only the cost, but the report is also now available in a week time against 3-4 weeks time earlier.


Similarly, entire tumor profiling used to take about 4 weeks and now it can be done in 7 days. Though the essays are still a bit expensive for the common man, I expect the costs will come down further with time.


Not only the turnaround time and cost but also the information derived out of these assays is getting better and more relevant. These changes can be definitely attributed to advancements in technology and growing demand.


Cost of assays has come down while the range of assays has grown up substantially. For example, BRCA screening for breast cancer was priced at around Rs 60,000 just couple of years back, but now costs around Rs 25,000. Not only the cost, the report is now available in a weeks time against 3-4 weeks’ time earlier.

Does your lab receive test requests from prescribers (doctors) OR are there cases of individuals coming to you on their own as they suspect them to be a carrier or at high risk?


Dr. Ravi: The advent of molecular technologies has revealed a wealth of information about signaling pathways and gene regulation in cancer. New biomarkers and methods for the classification of cancer subtypes, diagnosis, prognosis, and prediction of response to therapy have been emerging.


The term “ Molecular diagnostic’ covers three separate categories of test:

  • Diagnostic test - inform characteristics, indications, and diagnosis of a disease

  • Prognostic test - provide information about the likely future path and outcome of a disease

  • Predictive test – provide information on the likely response of a patient to a drug or therapy.


Each of these tests contributes something different to our understanding, the sum of the parts helping to build a more complete picture of the patient’s status.


Our lab receives both types of patients. The majority of the patients are referred by doctors for finer diagnosis, but a few who come for predictive assays or prognostic assays do come directly. Generally, people who feel that they are at high risk but are not suffering visit our facility directly. The latter trend is increasing because of the increased awareness, lowering of cost, reduced turnaround time, better & relevant information, and high-quality pre & post assay counseling.


Talking about personalized therapies, do you see an increase in this trend among Indian physicians?


Dr. Ravi: Definitely. For almost all cancers, be it solid or hematological, clinicians have moved toward personalized therapies and it is now routine medical practice in almost all private and bigger centers. Every clinician prefers to get molecular testing done to understand the nature & behavior of the tumor and treat it accordingly. It adds to the cost, but it directs to the final diagnosis and in defining the therapy. Without this information, we would just be giving broad-spectrum drugs.


In current medical practice, especially for the important tumors – breast, lung, prostate, pancreatic, oral, GIT cancers, lymphomas, leukemias, myelomas, etc personalized medicine is already well-defined and is in practice. Definitely, advancements in molecular technology in this new era of precision medicine have led to the parallel development of companion diagnostics and novel tumor inhibitors.


As mentioned earlier, cost, turnaround time, skill, and quality of reporting is important aspect to be looked into. A delayed report which comes in 8 weeks probably won’t help!

Are there any key challenges in the prescription of personalized medicine in India?


Dr. Ravi: One of the key challenges is to demonstrate the clinical value of a diagnostic test. It takes fairly a long time taken before a doctor starts prescribing assays, based on these new technologies. It involves validation, education, and creating awareness. In the fast-growing technology space, by the time, all this happens and doctors start prescribing these assays,a better technology-driven assay arrives. Efforts are wasted and the cycle restarts!


Over the last 5 years, molecular testing has seen many ups and down, due to so many rapid changes. Of late, there is some stabilization. Doctors are now aware of the assays, various technologies, their clinical benefits and are now balancing out the use of conventional technologies vs the modern ones. The future is all set for Molecular biology or rather a Molecular Pathology.


As mentioned earlier, cost, turnaround time, skill, and quality of reporting is important aspect to be looked into. A delayed report which comes in 8 weeks probably won’t help! It is only when the tumor is resistant to the treatment and there is no easy option that patient will utilize molecular tests. All new technologies are trying to overcome all such challenges.


Most insurance companies and government insurance schemes are skeptical of molecular tests and are not reimbursing. This is another important roadblock in the growth of molecular testing.


Could you comment on how easy it is to take samples for molecular tests? Also, how soon can patients expect to get their results?


Dr. Ravi: Genetic testing has now become very simple and easy. It is not just that the less amount of sample is required, but technology allows us to use multiple types of samples for molecular testing, like tumor cells or tissue, blood or plasma, oral swab, cervical swab, bone marrow, body fluids, etc. The main advantages of these procedures are that they are not invasive and with one sample, multiple tests can be done. Results can be expected as early as within 5 days at times.


Fine needle aspirate or needle biopsy can take out the tumor cells or tissue which can be easily used for cancer molecular assay. Such Tru-Cut biopsy can be done under local anesthesia and no general anesthesia is required. It has become a simple OPD procedure. Most procedures are very small walk-in, walk-out ones.


For cancers that are unapproachable for surgery, especially lung cancer, liquid biopsy is being used. This allows us to check for mutation using blood itself. Improvement in technology has led to these tests becoming easier and simpler.


The practice of targeted therapy will become more and more refined. It will be like a “cafeteria approach”, where for each type of mutation, specific drug therapy will be available.

What are the key future trends in the cancer molecular diagnostics area? How is the whole sector going to evolve?


Dr. Ravi:​As we go forward, I think cancer diagnosis will become a strong mix of surgical pathology, molecular pathology, and radiology. The practice of targeted therapy will become more and more refined. It will be like a “cafeteria approach”, where for each type of mutation, specific drug therapy will be available. Furthermore, bioinformatics and AI together will play an important role, wherein data regarding cancer-related mutations and patient information will be used to create better algorithms and personalized therapy. With basic genomic and other details, we will be able to know which drug will work with a patient’s tumor and how tumor progression will behave in a few years from now.


As we know, cancer development is not restricted to genetic alterations but can also be traced to epigenetic changes and protein expression levels. Studies of alterations in genetic, epigenetic, and expression processes can help establish diagnostic biomarkers of tumors and classification of tumors based on recognition of complex molecular profiles or unique molecular alterations that occur in the specific tumor types.


However, it’s very difficult to achieve such objectives in practice for several reasons. The criss-cross of different cancer-related pathways complicates the understanding of cancer biology. There is considerable heterogeneity in the tumor and functions of the genes among individuals with the same types of cancers. The treatment targets are not absolutely specific to cancer cells. The effectiveness of the treatments is limited because the targets are affected by other factors and the functions of the targets may change over time and produce resistance to the treatment. When so much is not known about a disease like cancer, there is a strong requirement of new biomarkers which determine the cause of the disease or susceptibility. High-throughput molecular discovery tools like next-generation sequencing will definitely take the diagnosis to next level and a better understanding of disease development and progression,


The question remains as to whether the biomarker and the technology can become a clinically and economically feasible clinical tool. To answer the question requires a time and resource-intensive development process.


Lastly, the advent of Molecular Radiology is taking molecular testing to a different level. It is currently in the experimental stage. It involves the replacement of the frozen section with smart knives. Who knows the molecular radiology diagnosis will tell us about the tumor mutations and progression. Future is still to be seen, but I am sure it’s on-card!


As ever, the skill set will always be a big challenge, though automation and AI will help one can’t deny the utility and importance of ‘Real Brains’!


These new tests will impact not only the business of diagnostics from a low margin, single measurement science to a high value, information-intensive science, but also, with acceptance by clinicians, the way medicine is practiced in the future.


Thank you Dr. Ravi for this insightful discussion!


Dr. Ravi: Thank you as well!

Comments


bottom of page